ᱨᱮᱫ:Open access citation advantage.png

Page contents not supported in other languages.
ᱣᱤᱠᱤᱯᱤᱰᱤᱭᱟ, ᱨᱟᱲᱟ ᱜᱮᱭᱟᱱ ᱯᱩᱛᱷᱤ ᱠᱷᱚᱱ

ᱟᱥᱚᱞ ᱨᱮᱫ(᱔,᱐᱒᱙ x ᱒,᱕᱘᱒ pixels, file size: ᱕᱔᱒ KB, MIME type: image/png)

ᱱᱚᱣᱟ ᱨᱮᱫ ᱫᱚ ᱱᱚᱸᱰᱮ ᱠᱷᱚᱱ Wikimedia Commons ᱟᱨ ᱯᱟᱥᱮᱡ ᱮᱴᱟᱜ-ᱟ ᱯᱚᱨᱡᱮᱠᱴ ᱨᱮᱦᱚᱸ ᱵᱮᱵᱦᱟᱨᱚᱜ ᱠᱟᱱᱟ᱾ ᱱᱚᱣᱟ ᱨᱮᱭᱟ ᱯᱟᱥᱱᱟᱣ ᱠᱟᱛᱷᱟ ᱨᱮᱫ ᱯᱟᱥᱱᱟᱣ ᱥᱟᱦᱴᱟ ᱞᱟᱛᱟᱨᱨᱮ ᱮᱢ ᱮᱱᱟ᱾

ᱢᱩᱬᱩᱛ ᱠᱟᱛᱷᱟ

ᱵᱤᱵᱚᱨᱚᱱᱤ
English: Comparison of w:OA publications to non-OA publications for academic citations (n=44),[1] HTML views (n=4),[2][3][4][5] PDF downloads (n=3),[3][4][5] twitter (n=2),[6][2] Wikipedia (n=1).[7]
ᱢᱟᱹᱦᱤᱛ
ᱯᱷᱮᱰᱟᱛ ᱤᱧᱟᱜ ᱠᱟᱹᱢᱤ
ᱚᱱᱚᱞᱤᱭᱟᱹ Thomas Shafee
This graph image could be re-created using vector graphics as an SVG file. This has several advantages; see Commons:Media for cleanup for more information. If an SVG form of this image is available, please upload it and afterwards replace this template with {{vector version available|new image name}}.


It is recommended to name the SVG file “Open access citation advantage.svg”—then the template Vector version available (or Vva) does not need the new image name parameter.

ᱞᱟᱭᱥᱮᱱᱥ ᱛᱮᱭᱟᱨ

I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:
w:en:Creative Commons
ᱟᱴᱨᱤᱵᱩᱥᱚᱱ
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
ᱟᱲᱟᱜ ᱜᱮᱭᱟᱢ:
  • ᱦᱟᱹᱴᱤᱧᱢᱮ – ᱱᱚᱠᱚᱞ ᱞᱟᱹᱜᱤᱫ, ᱦᱟᱹᱴᱤᱧ ᱟᱨ ᱵᱷᱮᱡᱟᱭᱢᱮ ᱠᱟᱹᱢᱤ
  • ᱢᱮᱥᱟᱣᱠᱟᱛᱢᱮ – ᱠᱟᱹᱢᱤ ᱟᱞᱜᱟᱭ ᱞᱟᱹᱜᱤᱫ
ᱞᱟᱛᱟᱨ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱨᱤᱛ ᱞᱮᱠᱟᱛᱮ:
  • ᱟᱴᱨᱤᱵᱩᱥᱚᱱ – ᱟᱢ ᱠᱟᱹᱢᱤ ᱥᱚᱫᱚᱨ ᱦᱩᱭᱟᱢᱟ ᱡᱚᱠᱷᱚᱱ ᱚᱱᱚᱞᱤᱭᱟᱹ ᱟᱨᱵᱟᱝ ᱞᱟᱭᱥᱮᱸᱥᱩᱭᱟᱹ ᱫᱟᱨᱟᱭᱛᱮ ᱠᱟᱛᱷᱟ ᱨᱟᱠᱟᱵ ᱠᱷᱟᱱ (ᱢᱮᱱᱠᱷᱟᱱ ᱟᱠᱚ ᱩᱫᱩᱜᱟᱜ ᱦᱚᱨ ᱛᱮᱫᱚ ᱵᱟᱝ ᱡᱟᱦᱟᱸ ᱟᱠᱚᱠᱚ ᱜᱚᱲᱚᱣᱟᱢ ᱟᱨᱵᱟᱝ ᱟᱢᱟᱜ ᱠᱟᱹᱢᱤ ᱨᱮᱱᱟᱜ ᱵᱮᱵᱷᱟᱨ)
  1. McKiernan, Erin C (2016-07-07). "How open science helps researchers succeed". eLife 5: e16800. DOI:10.7554/eLife.16800. ISSN 2050-084X.
  2. a b Wang, Xianwen (2015-05-01). "The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention". Scientometrics 103 (2): 555–564. DOI:10.1007/s11192-015-1547-0. ISSN 1588-2861.
  3. a b Davis, Philip M. (2011-03-30). "Open access, readership, citations: a randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing". The FASEB Journal 25 (7): 2129–2134. DOI:10.1096/fj.11-183988. ISSN 0892-6638.
  4. a b Davis, Philip M. (2010). "Does open access lead to increased readership and citations? A randomized controlled trial of articles published in APS journals". The Physiologist 53 (6): 197, 200–201. PMID 21473414. ISSN 0031-9376.
  5. a b Davis, Philip M. (2008-07-31). "Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: randomised controlled trial". BMJ 337. DOI:10.1136/bmj.a568. PMID 18669565. ISSN 0959-8138.
  6. Adie, Euan (2014-10-24). "Attention! A study of open access vs non-open access articles". Altmetric.com. DOI:10.6084/m9.figshare.1213690.v1.
  7. (2016). "Amplifying the impact of open access: Wikipedia and the diffusion of science". Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 68 (9): 2116-2127. DOI:10.1002/asi.23687.

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Items portrayed in this file

ᱞᱟ.ᱭᱟᱭ

open access citation advantage ᱟᱝᱜᱽᱨᱮᱡᱤ

of ᱟᱝᱜᱽᱨᱮᱡᱤ: academic journal article ᱟᱝᱜᱽᱨᱮᱡᱤ

open access ᱟᱝᱜᱽᱨᱮᱡᱤ

citation ᱟᱝᱜᱽᱨᱮᱡᱤ

altmetrics ᱟᱝᱜᱽᱨᱮᱡᱤ

creator ᱟᱝᱜᱽᱨᱮᱡᱤ

some value

author name string ᱟᱝᱜᱽᱨᱮᱡᱤ: Thomas Shafee

copyright status ᱟᱝᱜᱽᱨᱮᱡᱤ

copyrighted ᱟᱝᱜᱽᱨᱮᱡᱤ

copyright license ᱟᱝᱜᱽᱨᱮᱡᱤ

source of file ᱟᱝᱜᱽᱨᱮᱡᱤ

original creation by uploader ᱟᱝᱜᱽᱨᱮᱡᱤ

inception ᱟᱝᱜᱽᱨᱮᱡᱤ

᱓ ᱡᱟᱱᱩᱣᱟᱨᱤ 2020

media type ᱟᱝᱜᱽᱨᱮᱡᱤ

image/png

ᱨᱮᱫ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱱᱟᱜᱟᱢ

ᱚᱠᱛᱚ ᱨᱮ ᱞᱤᱱ ᱢᱮ/ᱚᱠᱛᱚ ᱨᱮ ᱨᱮᱫ ᱧᱮᱞ ᱞᱟᱹᱜᱤᱛ ᱞᱤᱱ ᱢᱮ

ᱢᱟᱹᱦᱤᱛ/ᱚᱠᱛᱚᱴᱤᱯᱡᱚᱠᱷᱟᱵᱮᱵᱷᱟᱨᱤᱭᱟᱹᱠᱟᱛᱷᱟ
ᱱᱤᱛᱚᱜ᱐᱙:᱔᱔, ᱓ ᱡᱟᱱᱩᱣᱟᱨᱤ ᱒᱐᱒᱐᱐᱙:᱔᱔, ᱓ ᱡᱟᱱᱩᱣᱟᱨᱤ ᱒᱐᱒᱐ ᱞᱮᱠᱟᱛᱮ ᱛᱷᱚᱢᱵᱽᱱᱮᱞ ᱵᱷᱚᱨᱥᱚᱱ᱔,᱐᱒᱙ × ᱒,᱕᱘᱒ (᱕᱔᱒ KB)Evolution and evolvabilityCross-wiki upload from en.wikipedia.org

ᱱᱚᱸᱰᱮ ᱫᱚ ᱟᱨ ᱮᱴᱟᱜ ᱥᱟᱦᱴᱟᱠᱚ ᱵᱟᱱᱩᱜ-ᱟ ᱡᱟᱸᱦᱟᱸ ᱥᱟᱶᱛᱮ ᱱᱤᱭᱟᱹ ᱨᱮᱫ ᱨᱮᱱᱟᱜ ᱡᱚᱱᱚᱲ ᱢᱮᱱᱟᱜ-ᱟ

ᱡᱮᱜᱮᱛ ᱡᱟᱠᱟᱛ ᱨᱮᱫ ᱵᱮᱵᱷᱟᱨᱟᱜ

ᱱᱚᱶᱟ ᱨᱮᱫᱠᱚ ᱵᱮᱵᱷᱟᱨᱟᱠᱟᱫ ᱣᱤᱠᱤᱠᱚ :

ᱢᱮᱴᱟ ᱥᱟᱹᱠᱷᱭᱟᱹᱛ