Codename Lisa ᱵᱮᱵᱷᱟᱨᱤᱭᱟᱜ ᱮᱱᱮᱢᱠᱩ
A user with ᱐ edits. Account created on ᱑᱐ ᱚᱠᱴᱚᱵᱚᱨ ᱒᱐᱒᱒.
᱒᱓ ᱯᱷᱮᱵᱽᱨᱩᱣᱟᱨᱤ ᱒᱐᱑᱘
- ᱑᱒:᱔᱔᱑᱒:᱔᱔, ᱒᱓ ᱯᱷᱮᱵᱽᱨᱩᱣᱟᱨᱤ ᱒᱐᱑᱘ ᱡᱩᱫᱟᱹ ᱱᱟᱜᱟᱢ −᱕᱔ ᱢᱳᱰᱩᱞ:URL Per talk page request. I studied the syntax carefully. Looks like it is alright after all. Since two eyes have seen this, I assume it is okay to commit it to the production version.
᱑ ᱡᱩᱞᱟᱭ ᱒᱐᱑᱗
- ᱑᱓:᱓᱐᱑᱓:᱓᱐, ᱑ ᱡᱩᱞᱟᱭ ᱒᱐᱑᱗ ᱡᱩᱫᱟᱹ ᱱᱟᱜᱟᱢ +᱔᱙᱕ ᱢᱳᱰᱩᱞ:URL Deploying the fixed code from the sandbox. See Template talk:Official website#Problem_with_Template:.27_used_in_website_description for details.
᱓᱐ ᱡᱩᱱ ᱒᱐᱑᱗
- ᱐᱖:᱐᱕᱐᱖:᱐᱕, ᱓᱐ ᱡᱩᱱ ᱒᱐᱑᱗ ᱡᱩᱫᱟᱹ ᱱᱟᱜᱟᱢ −᱑᱓᱓ ᱢᱳᱰᱩᱞ:URL Reverted good faith edits by Ahecht (talk): Your test case is unsatisfactory. It is not a bar-all case.
᱑᱒ ᱢᱮ ᱒᱐᱑᱗
- ᱑᱑:᱓᱕᱑᱑:᱓᱕, ᱑᱒ ᱢᱮ ᱒᱐᱑᱗ ᱡᱩᱫᱟᱹ ᱱᱟᱜᱟᱢ −᱙ ᱢᱳᱰᱩᱞ:URL Looks like unless the error is big and red, nobody is noticing it.
᱘ ᱢᱮ ᱒᱐᱑᱗
- ᱑᱑:᱕᱘᱑᱑:᱕᱘, ᱘ ᱢᱮ ᱒᱐᱑᱗ ᱡᱩᱫᱟᱹ ᱱᱟᱜᱟᱢ −᱒᱙ ᱢᱳᱰᱩᱞ:URL It is foolish to advertise the use of parameter that we are deprecating
᱑᱙ ᱮᱯᱨᱤᱞ ᱒᱐᱑᱗
- ᱐᱕:᱒᱑᱐᱕:᱒᱑, ᱑᱙ ᱮᱯᱨᱤᱞ ᱒᱐᱑᱗ ᱡᱩᱫᱟᱹ ᱱᱟᱜᱟᱢ −᱑᱑ ᱪᱷᱟᱸᱪ:URL Removed the discontinued parameter. It was long overdue.
᱓᱐ ᱚᱠᱴᱚᱵᱚᱨ ᱒᱐᱑᱖
- ᱑᱓:᱔᱙᱑᱓:᱔᱙, ᱓᱐ ᱚᱠᱴᱚᱵᱚᱨ ᱒᱐᱑᱖ ᱡᱩᱫᱟᱹ ᱱᱟᱜᱟᱢ −᱖᱐ ᱪᱷᱟᱸᱪ:Infobox website Undid revision 746799654 by CFCF (talk) More aliases means less performance
᱑᱓ ᱚᱠᱴᱚᱵᱚᱨ ᱒᱐᱑᱖
- ᱐᱘:᱕᱑᱐᱘:᱕᱑, ᱑᱓ ᱚᱠᱴᱚᱵᱚᱨ ᱒᱐᱑᱖ ᱡᱩᱫᱟᱹ ᱱᱟᱜᱟᱢ −᱓,᱕᱔᱕ ᱪᱷᱟᱸᱪ:Infobox website Reverted 11 edits by CFCF (talk): This is an article to do bold edit. This is a highly visible template. Sandbox and peer-review first.
- ᱐᱑:᱓᱗᱐᱑:᱓᱗, ᱑᱓ ᱚᱠᱴᱚᱵᱚᱨ ᱒᱐᱑᱖ ᱡᱩᱫᱟᱹ ᱱᱟᱜᱟᱢ −᱓,᱐᱘᱒ ᱪᱷᱟᱸᱪ:Infobox website Reverted to revision 739864785 by Izno (talk): Reverted to the last known good version after observing multiple damaging edits by CFCF.
᱙ ᱚᱠᱴᱚᱵᱚᱨ ᱒᱐᱑᱖
- ᱐᱙:᱕᱕᱐᱙:᱕᱕, ᱙ ᱚᱠᱴᱚᱵᱚᱨ ᱒᱐᱑᱖ ᱡᱩᱫᱟᱹ ᱱᱟᱜᱟᱢ −᱘ ᱪᱷᱟᱸᱪ:Infobox website Reverted change by User:CFCF. Where is the consensus for this change?
᱘ ᱚᱠᱴᱚᱵᱚᱨ ᱒᱐᱑᱖
- ᱑᱕:᱐᱕᱑᱕:᱐᱕, ᱘ ᱚᱠᱴᱚᱵᱚᱨ ᱒᱐᱑᱖ ᱡᱩᱫᱟᱹ ᱱᱟᱜᱟᱢ −᱑ ᱪᱷᱟᱸᱪ:Infobox website Null edit to force a refresh
- ᱐᱙:᱒᱗᱐᱙:᱒᱗, ᱘ ᱚᱠᱴᱚᱵᱚᱨ ᱒᱐᱑᱖ ᱡᱩᱫᱟᱹ ᱱᱟᱜᱟᱢ −᱑ ᱪᱷᱟᱸᱪ:URL No edit summary
᱒᱑ ᱚᱜᱚᱥᱴ ᱒᱐᱑᱖
- ᱐᱗:᱐᱙᱐᱗:᱐᱙, ᱒᱑ ᱚᱜᱚᱥᱴ ᱒᱐᱑᱖ ᱡᱩᱫᱟᱹ ᱱᱟᱜᱟᱢ −᱑᱙ ᱪᱷᱟᱸᱪ:URL Reverted good faith edits by Izno (talk): Please see the talk page.
᱖ ᱰᱤᱥᱮᱢᱵᱚᱨ ᱒᱐᱑᱔
- ᱐᱕:᱒᱗᱐᱕:᱒᱗, ᱖ ᱰᱤᱥᱮᱢᱵᱚᱨ ᱒᱐᱑᱔ ᱡᱩᱫᱟᱹ ᱱᱟᱜᱟᱢ +᱓᱘᱐ ᱢᱳᱰᱩᱞ:URL Alright, redeploying. I feel this Module is thoroughly tested this time. I even spot-checked it against Portable Document Format right now.
- ᱐᱓:᱒᱖᱐᱓:᱒᱖, ᱖ ᱰᱤᱥᱮᱢᱵᱚᱨ ᱒᱐᱑᱔ ᱡᱩᱫᱟᱹ ᱱᱟᱜᱟᱢ −᱓᱐᱕ ᱢᱳᱰᱩᱞ:URL Reverted 1 edit by Codename Lisa (talk): I CANNOT believe this... We test and test and test and nobody notices?
- ᱐᱓:᱒᱔᱐᱓:᱒᱔, ᱖ ᱰᱤᱥᱮᱢᱵᱚᱨ ᱒᱐᱑᱔ ᱡᱩᱫᱟᱹ ᱱᱟᱜᱟᱢ +᱓᱐᱕ ᱢᱳᱰᱩᱞ:URL Sandbox testing successful. The active discussion thread at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#Chrome vs. Firefox Wikipedia rendering didn't register any blocking objection. Tests at Well... I guess it is all well.
᱒᱙ ᱱᱚᱵᱷᱮᱢᱵᱚᱨ ᱒᱐᱑᱔
- ᱐᱘:᱑᱘᱐᱘:᱑᱘, ᱒᱙ ᱱᱚᱵᱷᱮᱢᱵᱚᱨ ᱒᱐᱑᱔ ᱡᱩᱫᱟᱹ ᱱᱟᱜᱟᱢ +᱒᱖᱕ ᱪᱷᱟᱸᱪ:Infobox website Added the same language syntax that is available in {{infobox software}} and {{infobox web browser}} (I think). Spot-tested against OneDrive. Seems to work okay.
᱓᱐ ᱢᱮ ᱒᱐᱑᱔
- ᱑᱙:᱔᱘᱑᱙:᱔᱘, ᱓᱐ ᱢᱮ ᱒᱐᱑᱔ ᱡᱩᱫᱟᱹ ᱱᱟᱜᱟᱢ +᱙᱘ ᱪᱷᱟᱸᱪ:Infobox website Committing a modified version of User:Sardanaphalus's request.
᱒᱙ ᱢᱮ ᱒᱐᱑᱔
- ᱑᱓:᱐᱗᱑᱓:᱐᱗, ᱒᱙ ᱢᱮ ᱒᱐᱑᱔ ᱡᱩᱫᱟᱹ ᱱᱟᱜᱟᱢ −᱓᱐ ᱪᱷᱟᱸᱪ:Infobox website Oh, I see we already have a talk page discussion about changing this too. Plus Template talk:Infobox software#RfC: natural and programming languages labels has already obtained wide community consensus.
- ᱑᱐:᱕᱓᱑᱐:᱕᱓, ᱒᱙ ᱢᱮ ᱒᱐᱑᱔ ᱡᱩᱫᱟᱹ ᱱᱟᱜᱟᱢ +᱒᱘ ᱪᱷᱟᱸᱪ:Infobox website Endorsed one edit request by User:Sardanaphalus. (See: talk page.)
᱑ ᱰᱤᱥᱮᱢᱵᱚᱨ ᱒᱐᱑᱓
- ᱑᱘:᱑᱔᱑᱘:᱑᱔, ᱑ ᱰᱤᱥᱮᱢᱵᱚᱨ ᱒᱐᱑᱓ ᱡᱩᱫᱟᱹ ᱱᱟᱜᱟᱢ +᱑ ᱪᱷᱟᱸᱪ:Infobox website This is better, given the state of articles... Still, no one is using it yet, so no harm is done.
- ᱑᱘:᱑᱒᱑᱘:᱑᱒, ᱑ ᱰᱤᱥᱮᱢᱵᱚᱨ ᱒᱐᱑᱓ ᱡᱩᱫᱟᱹ ᱱᱟᱜᱟᱢ +᱒᱑᱙ ᱪᱷᱟᱸᱪ:Infobox website {{#invoke:InfoboxImage}}
 |